We use cookies to ensure the website functions reliably, remembers basic selections, and recognizes useful pages. You can accept, decline, or review the settings.
Manage company assessments, quality programs, and audit processes on a central platform. Automated submissions, structured document review, and traceable results for organizations in any industry.
Audit software for Austria
ISO 9001 · EFQM · Compliance
How does your assessment process work today?
The digital certification and assessment platform guides organizations from the initial submission to the completed audit—with clear criteria, traceable decisions, and documented results.
Applications, evidence, and documents are managed centrally through a unified form system. Your team no longer needs to coordinate documents by email or post—the status is visible to all parties at all times.
Less coordination effort, shorter turnaround timesReviewers receive a clear checklist with all relevant evidence. Each document is versioned and timestamped, ensuring the entire review process remains fully traceable.
Complete audit trails for every assessmentAll assessments are based on clearly defined criteria that are equally visible to applicants and reviewers. This builds trust in the process and facilitates internal communication of the results.
Traceable decisions for all parties involvedFrom scheduling to execution to result documentation: the platform supports auditors with structured templates and automated reminders. No step is overlooked.
More efficient audits without media breaksAll submitted documents are stored securely and centrally. Authorized users can access the latest version from anywhere—without local file storage or outdated file versions.
One reliable place for all evidenceThe platform automatically generates reports on the status of ongoing assessments and completed certifications. These overviews facilitate internal management and communication with supervisory bodies.
Reliable metrics for management and auditingBook a non-binding demo and see how your audit processes are mapped on a central platform.
To ensure that assessment procedures and certification processes remain unambiguous, the following definitions and conditions apply. They supplement the general terms of use and are part of every submission.
A submission is only considered complete once all mandatory fields marked in the respective assessment form have been filled in and the required supporting documents have been uploaded. If documents are missing, the submission will not be released for review. Subsequent additions are only possible within the specified submission deadline.
Each criterion has a fixed weighting that is published before the start of the procedure. The weightings are identical for all participating organizations and are not changed during the ongoing procedure. Deviations are only possible in the case of a new edition of the program and will be communicated in a timely manner.
Auditors assess solely on the basis of the submitted documents and the defined criteria. Personal assessments or experiences from previous projects are not included in the evaluation. Each decision is documented with a brief justification and is visible to the submitting organization.
Submitted documents are treated confidentially and are only made accessible to those persons directly involved in the assessment process. After the procedure is completed, the documents are archived in accordance with data protection regulations or deleted at the organization's request. They are not passed on to third parties.
If an organization identifies discrepancies in the process, it can request a written clarification within ten working days of the announcement of the result. The request will be reviewed by an independent body. The decision will be communicated in writing and cannot be further appealed.
In-depth articles on audit software, quality models, and transparent evaluation processes—selected for decision-makers looking to advance their certification processes.
How a mid-sized company from Austria moved its internal quality inspections from paper to a centralized platform. The article describes the steps from requirements analysis through software selection to auditor training and highlights the improvements that were measurable after six months.
EFQM, ISO 9001, and other frameworks differ significantly in focus, implementation effort, and suitability for specific industries. The article helps decide which model fits company size, maturity level, and strategic goals.
Certifications thrive on trust. Digital platforms with standardized criteria, audit trails, and complete documentation increase objectivity. A case study shows how an internationally operating company restructured its evaluation workflows.
A centralized document management system is the foundation for traceable certifications. The article explains how versioning, access rights, and audit trails are set up in practice to ensure audits run smoothly.
International quality programs impose different requirements on evidence and reporting. This article shows how companies structure their submissions and which criteria matter most in evaluations by external auditors.